https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286035 The court confirmed the Subordinate Judge's decision in favor of the plaintiff, granting him a one-ninth share of the family properties. It was established that the business conducted by the brothers was a joint family business, and properties claimed as stridhana were deemed joint family assets. The appeal challenging the joint family property findings was dismissed, with the court criticizing the first defendant's behavior and ordering him to cover the plaintiff's costs. The appeal was deemed frivolous and lacking merit, leading to its dismissal. en-us Thu, 16 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:32:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286035 The court confirmed the Subordinate Judge's decision in favor of the plaintiff, granting him a one-ninth share of the family properties. It was established that the business conducted by the brothers was a joint family business, and properties claimed as stridhana were deemed joint family assets. The appeal challenging the joint family property findings was dismissed, with the court criticizing the first defendant's behavior and ordering him to cover the plaintiff's costs. The appeal was deemed frivolous and lacking merit, leading to its dismissal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286035