https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286029 Limitation ran from the date the ornaments were sold and used for renovation, because later pleaded dates did not affect the cause of action. A recital in the will did not amount to an acknowledgment of a subsisting liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, as it merely described the use of the ornaments and did not admit any present debt or jural relationship. Section 13 did not extend time, because the fiction of filing on the date of a pauper application applies only within the same proceeding after conversion, not to a later independent suit. The plaint therefore disclosed an out-of-time claim and had to fail under Section 3. en-us Fri, 03 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Feb 2020 10:14:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286029 Limitation ran from the date the ornaments were sold and used for renovation, because later pleaded dates did not affect the cause of action. A recital in the will did not amount to an acknowledgment of a subsisting liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, as it merely described the use of the ornaments and did not admit any present debt or jural relationship. Section 13 did not extend time, because the fiction of filing on the date of a pauper application applies only within the same proceeding after conversion, not to a later independent suit. The plaint therefore disclosed an out-of-time claim and had to fail under Section 3. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286029