https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391939 A fresh preventive detention order was upheld where it rested on subsequent independent material gathered after revocation of the earlier order, including travel patterns, mobile-phone material and foreign-exchange records; the earlier revocation did not by itself bar renewed detention. The challenge based on alleged non-consideration of representation before the Advisory Board also failed because the detenu and counsel appeared without objection and no denial of the statutory opportunity was shown. Detention remained sustainable despite seizure of the passport and existing custody, since the authority recorded satisfaction that release was likely and preventive detention was necessary to prevent further prejudicial activity. en-us Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391939 A fresh preventive detention order was upheld where it rested on subsequent independent material gathered after revocation of the earlier order, including travel patterns, mobile-phone material and foreign-exchange records; the earlier revocation did not by itself bar renewed detention. The challenge based on alleged non-consideration of representation before the Advisory Board also failed because the detenu and counsel appeared without objection and no denial of the statutory opportunity was shown. Detention remained sustainable despite seizure of the passport and existing custody, since the authority recorded satisfaction that release was likely and preventive detention was necessary to prevent further prejudicial activity. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391939