<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>India&#039;s E-Governance Initiative: Streamlining Tax Assessments with Minimal Human Interaction Raises Concerns Over Possible Errors.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51672</link>
    <description>The Government of India has introduced E-Governance for conduct of assessment proceedings electronically. It is a laudable steps taken by the Income Tax Department to pave way for an objective assessment without human interaction. At the same time, such proceedings can lead to erroneous assessment if officers are not able to understand the transactions and statement of accounts of an assessee without a personal hearing. The respondent should have to be therefore at least called for an explanation in writing before proceeding to conclude that the amount collected by the petitioner was unusual.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:51:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:51:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>India&#039;s E-Governance Initiative: Streamlining Tax Assessments with Minimal Human Interaction Raises Concerns Over Possible Errors.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51672</link>
      <description>The Government of India has introduced E-Governance for conduct of assessment proceedings electronically. It is a laudable steps taken by the Income Tax Department to pave way for an objective assessment without human interaction. At the same time, such proceedings can lead to erroneous assessment if officers are not able to understand the transactions and statement of accounts of an assessee without a personal hearing. The respondent should have to be therefore at least called for an explanation in writing before proceeding to conclude that the amount collected by the petitioner was unusual.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:51:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>