<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1569 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286024</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, rejected the petition for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution process between an Operational Creditor and a Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found that pre-existing disputes regarding payment existed, indicating a genuine dispute raised by the Corporate Debtor. It concluded that the disputes required adjudication, potentially through arbitration, and the Operational Creditor could not seek insolvency resolution based on disputed claims. The Tribunal emphasized the need to resolve underlying disputes through appropriate legal mechanisms, making the initiation of insolvency resolution unsustainable in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:56:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1569 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286024</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, rejected the petition for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution process between an Operational Creditor and a Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found that pre-existing disputes regarding payment existed, indicating a genuine dispute raised by the Corporate Debtor. It concluded that the disputes required adjudication, potentially through arbitration, and the Operational Creditor could not seek insolvency resolution based on disputed claims. The Tribunal emphasized the need to resolve underlying disputes through appropriate legal mechanisms, making the initiation of insolvency resolution unsustainable in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>