<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1315 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286026</link>
    <description>The court deemed Rule 2(1)(d)(EEC) and Rule 6(7CA) of the Service Tax Rules, along with Explanation-V to Notification No.30/2012-ST, as ultra vires the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the proceedings for collecting service tax on ocean freight in CIF contracts were invalidated, and all related actions against the petitioners were quashed with accompanying reliefs and benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1315 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286026</link>
      <description>The court deemed Rule 2(1)(d)(EEC) and Rule 6(7CA) of the Service Tax Rules, along with Explanation-V to Notification No.30/2012-ST, as ultra vires the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the proceedings for collecting service tax on ocean freight in CIF contracts were invalidated, and all related actions against the petitioners were quashed with accompanying reliefs and benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>