<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1716 - Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286020</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed whether a 25% pre-deposit could be insisted upon for admission of VAT appeals where the assessment orders were passed without proper consideration of the appellant&#039;s submissions and supporting material. It held that the First Appellate Authority was required to examine prima facie merits, the legality of the assessment, and the impact of any breach of natural justice before exercising discretion on pre-deposit. As the appeals had been dismissed mechanically for non-compliance and the appellant had already made payments, the 25% pre-deposit direction was set aside, a reduced deposit was directed, and the matters were remanded for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:51:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1716 - Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286020</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed whether a 25% pre-deposit could be insisted upon for admission of VAT appeals where the assessment orders were passed without proper consideration of the appellant&#039;s submissions and supporting material. It held that the First Appellate Authority was required to examine prima facie merits, the legality of the assessment, and the impact of any breach of natural justice before exercising discretion on pre-deposit. As the appeals had been dismissed mechanically for non-compliance and the appellant had already made payments, the 25% pre-deposit direction was set aside, a reduced deposit was directed, and the matters were remanded for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>