https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391896 A constitutional challenge was raised to the National Anti Profiteering Authority and to the impugned order, with a further request to defer hearing until the Supreme Court decided the transfer application. The hearing was deferred to a later date, the petitions were directed to be listed for directions, and the proceedings before the Authority were to remain adjourned beyond the next date, with advance notice required before any implementation of the impugned order. en-us Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 12:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391896 A constitutional challenge was raised to the National Anti Profiteering Authority and to the impugned order, with a further request to defer hearing until the Supreme Court decided the transfer application. The hearing was deferred to a later date, the petitions were directed to be listed for directions, and the proceedings before the Authority were to remain adjourned beyond the next date, with advance notice required before any implementation of the impugned order. Case-Laws GST Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391896