<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 333 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391889</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was deleted as the Assessing Officer did not establish satisfaction regarding concealment or inaccurate particulars, crucial for initiating penalty proceedings. The Court deemed the notice issued to the assessee as defective and emphasized the necessity of a clear basis for satisfaction in such notices. Relying on legal precedents, the Court dismissed the appeal, stating no substantial question of law arose, in line with previous decisions with similar facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2020 17:24:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 333 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391889</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was deleted as the Assessing Officer did not establish satisfaction regarding concealment or inaccurate particulars, crucial for initiating penalty proceedings. The Court deemed the notice issued to the assessee as defective and emphasized the necessity of a clear basis for satisfaction in such notices. Relying on legal precedents, the Court dismissed the appeal, stating no substantial question of law arose, in line with previous decisions with similar facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>