<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 329 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391885</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s quashing of the Director of Income Tax&#039;s order canceling the respondent&#039;s registration under Section 12AA(3). The Director failed to demonstrate that the respondent&#039;s activities were not genuine or inconsistent with its charitable objects, as required for cancellation. The Director&#039;s reliance on the proviso to Section 2(15) as a ground for cancellation was held improper, since such a determination affects exemption in assessment proceedings but does not justify cancellation of registration. The HC found no error in the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion that the Director&#039;s order lacked specific factual findings necessary under Section 12AA(3). The decision was against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 329 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391885</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s quashing of the Director of Income Tax&#039;s order canceling the respondent&#039;s registration under Section 12AA(3). The Director failed to demonstrate that the respondent&#039;s activities were not genuine or inconsistent with its charitable objects, as required for cancellation. The Director&#039;s reliance on the proviso to Section 2(15) as a ground for cancellation was held improper, since such a determination affects exemption in assessment proceedings but does not justify cancellation of registration. The HC found no error in the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion that the Director&#039;s order lacked specific factual findings necessary under Section 12AA(3). The decision was against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>