<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 82 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21324</link>
    <description>Rectification under section 154 is limited to mistakes apparent from the record and cannot be used to reopen a debatable issue. Where the assessee&#039;s entitlement to interest under section 214 depended on whether late advance tax payments qualified and whether interest was payable under sections 207 to 213, the question was not free from doubt. The earlier grant of interest therefore could not be withdrawn by rectification, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:49:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 82 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21324</link>
      <description>Rectification under section 154 is limited to mistakes apparent from the record and cannot be used to reopen a debatable issue. Where the assessee&#039;s entitlement to interest under section 214 depended on whether late advance tax payments qualified and whether interest was payable under sections 207 to 213, the question was not free from doubt. The earlier grant of interest therefore could not be withdrawn by rectification, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>