https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391864 The court rejected the defendants' plea for condonation of a 401-day delay in filing a Review Petition against the order dated 03.04.2018, citing Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The defendants' arguments regarding the infirmity of the order based on undisclosed MoU details, maintainability of the review petition due to previous dismissals, relevance of missing annexures to the MoU, breach of settlement agreements, dismissal of cases under Section 138 NI Act, and delays in filing the review application were all dismissed. The court deemed the review application meritless, imposed costs of &8377;10,000, and emphasized the importance of compliance and evidence in legal proceedings. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Feb 2020 07:30:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391864 The court rejected the defendants' plea for condonation of a 401-day delay in filing a Review Petition against the order dated 03.04.2018, citing Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The defendants' arguments regarding the infirmity of the order based on undisclosed MoU details, maintainability of the review petition due to previous dismissals, relevance of missing annexures to the MoU, breach of settlement agreements, dismissal of cases under Section 138 NI Act, and delays in filing the review application were all dismissed. The court deemed the review application meritless, imposed costs of &8377;10,000, and emphasized the importance of compliance and evidence in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391864