<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 304 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391860</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, M/s. Bright Marketing Company, finding that the penalty under Section 78 was not applicable. The Court set aside the penalty orders imposed by the original adjudicating authority and CESTAT, allowing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed by the Assessee without awarding any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2020 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 304 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391860</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, M/s. Bright Marketing Company, finding that the penalty under Section 78 was not applicable. The Court set aside the penalty orders imposed by the original adjudicating authority and CESTAT, allowing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed by the Assessee without awarding any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>