<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 292 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly dismissed the appeal regarding the benefit of Notification No. 12/2003, as the appellant failed to establish the value of goods and materials conclusively. The issue of eligibility for Cenvat Credit was remanded for further verification to the adjudicating authority. The decision emphasized the necessity of specific documentary proof to claim exemptions and credits under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 21:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 292 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly dismissed the appeal regarding the benefit of Notification No. 12/2003, as the appellant failed to establish the value of goods and materials conclusively. The issue of eligibility for Cenvat Credit was remanded for further verification to the adjudicating authority. The decision emphasized the necessity of specific documentary proof to claim exemptions and credits under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>