https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391844 CESTAT Chennai held that the beverage was correctly classifiable under Chapter Sub-heading 2202 9020 as a fruit juice based drink, because the product met the relevant requirements for lime or lemon juice content and total soluble solids. The classification issue had already been settled by a Larger Bench in the appellant's own case, and that binding reasoning could not be displaced by describing the product as lemonade. A change in nomenclature or market description did not justify reclassification under Chapter Sub-heading 2202 1020. en-us Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Feb 2020 21:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391844 CESTAT Chennai held that the beverage was correctly classifiable under Chapter Sub-heading 2202 9020 as a fruit juice based drink, because the product met the relevant requirements for lime or lemon juice content and total soluble solids. The classification issue had already been settled by a Larger Bench in the appellant's own case, and that binding reasoning could not be displaced by describing the product as lemonade. A change in nomenclature or market description did not justify reclassification under Chapter Sub-heading 2202 1020. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391844