<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 286 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391842</link>
    <description>Time spent by a financial creditor in pursuing SARFAESI remedies was treated as excludable under Section 14(2) of the Limitation Act because those proceedings were prosecuted with due diligence and in good faith for the same relief. Applying that exclusion, the Section 7 insolvency application was computed within the limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, so the time-bar objection failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 286 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391842</link>
      <description>Time spent by a financial creditor in pursuing SARFAESI remedies was treated as excludable under Section 14(2) of the Limitation Act because those proceedings were prosecuted with due diligence and in good faith for the same relief. Applying that exclusion, the Section 7 insolvency application was computed within the limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, so the time-bar objection failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>