<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 283 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391839</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by determining that the goods manufactured by the appellant should be classified under heading 4901, attracting a &quot;Nil&quot; rate of duty. As a result, the demands for duty, interest, and penalty were deemed unsustainable. The impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2020 07:28:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 283 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391839</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by determining that the goods manufactured by the appellant should be classified under heading 4901, attracting a &quot;Nil&quot; rate of duty. As a result, the demands for duty, interest, and penalty were deemed unsustainable. The impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>