<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 671 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286009</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the amounts related to the sale of mines and unexplained investments, ruling in favor of the assessee. It found that the provisions of capital gains were not applicable during the relevant period, leading to the deletion of the amount as the relevant provisions came into effect after the assessed period. The Court emphasized the importance of legal interpretations and precedents in determining tax liabilities, ultimately dismissing the appeal by the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 671 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286009</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the amounts related to the sale of mines and unexplained investments, ruling in favor of the assessee. It found that the provisions of capital gains were not applicable during the relevant period, leading to the deletion of the amount as the relevant provisions came into effect after the assessed period. The Court emphasized the importance of legal interpretations and precedents in determining tax liabilities, ultimately dismissing the appeal by the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>