<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 268 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391824</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invalidated block assessments under sec.158BD due to the absence of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer, rendering the proceedings void ab initio. The CBDT Circular emphasized the necessity of recording satisfaction notes under sec.158BD/153C, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s directives in a related case. As a result, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn, underscoring the importance of strict compliance with legal requirements for the validity of block assessments and associated proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 11:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 268 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391824</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invalidated block assessments under sec.158BD due to the absence of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer, rendering the proceedings void ab initio. The CBDT Circular emphasized the necessity of recording satisfaction notes under sec.158BD/153C, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s directives in a related case. As a result, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn, underscoring the importance of strict compliance with legal requirements for the validity of block assessments and associated proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>