<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 246 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391802</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to reexamine the deduction claim under section 54F. The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to claim deduction u/s. 54F even for properties purchased outside India, citing consistent judicial precedents and the plain language of the statute. Consequently, the appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, clarifying the assessee&#039;s right to the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 10:50:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 246 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391802</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to reexamine the deduction claim under section 54F. The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to claim deduction u/s. 54F even for properties purchased outside India, citing consistent judicial precedents and the plain language of the statute. Consequently, the appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, clarifying the assessee&#039;s right to the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>