<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 244 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391800</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the additions and disallowances made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) for the assessment years 2006-07 to 2011-12. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of transactions, identity of investors, and sources of funds, leading to disallowances and additions totaling significant amounts. The appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed, highlighting the lack of cooperation and evidence to support the claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 10:48:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 244 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391800</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the additions and disallowances made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) for the assessment years 2006-07 to 2011-12. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of transactions, identity of investors, and sources of funds, leading to disallowances and additions totaling significant amounts. The appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed, highlighting the lack of cooperation and evidence to support the claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>