<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 78 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21312</link>
    <description>The court upheld the addition of Rs. 5,000 to the assessee&#039;s income for unaccounted expenditure during a trip to Kashmir, reducing the initial amount added by the Income-tax Officer. The court found the expenses disclosed were insufficient, considering the family size and nature of the trip. Section 69C of the Income-tax Act was deemed applicable as the assessee&#039;s explanation was not accepted. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the department and justifying the Rs. 5,000 addition for unexplained expenses. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:09:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 78 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21312</link>
      <description>The court upheld the addition of Rs. 5,000 to the assessee&#039;s income for unaccounted expenditure during a trip to Kashmir, reducing the initial amount added by the Income-tax Officer. The court found the expenses disclosed were insufficient, considering the family size and nature of the trip. Section 69C of the Income-tax Act was deemed applicable as the assessee&#039;s explanation was not accepted. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the department and justifying the Rs. 5,000 addition for unexplained expenses. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>