https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391794 The Delhi High Court held that no vested or accrued right arose under the 2013 Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations to insist on seven written examination chances or two oral chances, because the petitioner had not cleared the examination before the 2013 regime was superseded. Section 6(c) of the General Clauses Act did not preserve a mere facility or opportunity as an enforceable right against a later regulatory revision. The 2018 Regulations operated prospectively and could lawfully alter the examination scheme, including the number of attempts and the interview mode. The challenge to the amended regulations therefore failed, and the changes were not found arbitrary or unconstitutional. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Nov 2020 17:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391794 The Delhi High Court held that no vested or accrued right arose under the 2013 Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations to insist on seven written examination chances or two oral chances, because the petitioner had not cleared the examination before the 2013 regime was superseded. Section 6(c) of the General Clauses Act did not preserve a mere facility or opportunity as an enforceable right against a later regulatory revision. The 2018 Regulations operated prospectively and could lawfully alter the examination scheme, including the number of attempts and the interview mode. The challenge to the amended regulations therefore failed, and the changes were not found arbitrary or unconstitutional. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391794