<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 230 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391786</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal of a SEZ unit whose refund claim for Service Tax was rejected due to technical discrepancies in invoices and lack of proper documents. The tribunal held that the substantive benefit of refund should not be denied based on minor technical issues, emphasizing the government&#039;s policy of exempting or refunding input tax for SEZ units. The tribunal granted the refund to the SEZ unit, noting that the payment of tax was undisputed, and the SEZ unit was eligible for the refund under the SEZ Act, 2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 230 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391786</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal of a SEZ unit whose refund claim for Service Tax was rejected due to technical discrepancies in invoices and lack of proper documents. The tribunal held that the substantive benefit of refund should not be denied based on minor technical issues, emphasizing the government&#039;s policy of exempting or refunding input tax for SEZ units. The tribunal granted the refund to the SEZ unit, noting that the payment of tax was undisputed, and the SEZ unit was eligible for the refund under the SEZ Act, 2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>