https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391784 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (A)'s order and ruling in favor of the appellant. The appellant's prompt reversal of irregular credits, maintenance of sufficient balances, and eligibility of credit for vehicle maintenance were considered. The Tribunal held that no interest or penalty was due, supported by precedents. It also found in favor of the appellant regarding the eligibility of certain credits, ultimately providing relief and allowing the appeal. The judgment was delivered on 30/01/2020. en-us Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Feb 2020 10:06:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391784 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (A)'s order and ruling in favor of the appellant. The appellant's prompt reversal of irregular credits, maintenance of sufficient balances, and eligibility of credit for vehicle maintenance were considered. The Tribunal held that no interest or penalty was due, supported by precedents. It also found in favor of the appellant regarding the eligibility of certain credits, ultimately providing relief and allowing the appeal. The judgment was delivered on 30/01/2020. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391784