<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 221 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391777</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the impugned order confirming service tax liability for services provided by the petitioner between July 2008 to March 2009. The Court held that the petitioner&#039;s failure to file a statutory appeal in time, citing bereavement as a reason, did not justify the delay. Due to the petitioner&#039;s negligence in not participating in the adjudicatory process and failing to file a timely appeal, the Court found no merit in the petition and dismissed it without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 09:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 221 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391777</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the impugned order confirming service tax liability for services provided by the petitioner between July 2008 to March 2009. The Court held that the petitioner&#039;s failure to file a statutory appeal in time, citing bereavement as a reason, did not justify the delay. Due to the petitioner&#039;s negligence in not participating in the adjudicatory process and failing to file a timely appeal, the Court found no merit in the petition and dismissed it without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>