https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391775 A writ petition confined to a bank communication directing stoppage of outgoing transactions was held misconceived because the operative freezing order was passed later by the investigating officer and then forwarded for confirmation under the NDPS Act. The challenge did not assail that operative order, so the petition was not maintainable and was dismissed. The Court also noted that the interim restraint had prevented the competent authority from completing the statutory confirmation exercise, and extended the time for that process to be completed. en-us Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Feb 2020 09:44:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391775 A writ petition confined to a bank communication directing stoppage of outgoing transactions was held misconceived because the operative freezing order was passed later by the investigating officer and then forwarded for confirmation under the NDPS Act. The challenge did not assail that operative order, so the petition was not maintainable and was dismissed. The Court also noted that the interim restraint had prevented the competent authority from completing the statutory confirmation exercise, and extended the time for that process to be completed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391775