<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 218 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391774</link>
    <description>Section 50 of the NDPS Act is satisfied when the suspect is duly informed of the right to be searched before the nearest Gazetted Officer or Magistrate and then declines that option; a further search before such authority is not mandatory in those circumstances. A notice using the word &quot;can&quot; does not invalidate compliance if read as a whole and it clearly conveys the right. On the facts described, the search was not illegal for want of Section 50 compliance, and the conviction was not vitiated on that ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 09:44:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 218 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391774</link>
      <description>Section 50 of the NDPS Act is satisfied when the suspect is duly informed of the right to be searched before the nearest Gazetted Officer or Magistrate and then declines that option; a further search before such authority is not mandatory in those circumstances. A notice using the word &quot;can&quot; does not invalidate compliance if read as a whole and it clearly conveys the right. On the facts described, the search was not illegal for want of Section 50 compliance, and the conviction was not vitiated on that ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>