https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391773 The conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) read with Section 29 of the NDPS Act was left unchallenged on merits, so no interference was called for and the finding of guilt was confirmed. On sentence, the Court considered the period already undergone, satisfactory jail conduct, absence of previous conviction or other criminal involvement, and the sentencing principle under Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and reduced the default imprisonment from six months to two months while maintaining the fine. en-us Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Feb 2020 09:43:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391773 The conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) read with Section 29 of the NDPS Act was left unchallenged on merits, so no interference was called for and the finding of guilt was confirmed. On sentence, the Court considered the period already undergone, satisfactory jail conduct, absence of previous conviction or other criminal involvement, and the sentencing principle under Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and reduced the default imprisonment from six months to two months while maintaining the fine. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391773