<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1445 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285995</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal as time-barred by 3389 days for the assessment year 2001-02, despite the assessee&#039;s request for condonation of delay citing inadvertent error and personnel changes. The tribunal found the lack of cogent reasoning and supporting evidence for the delay, emphasizing the importance of diligence and absence of negligence. Despite reliance on case law, the delay of about 10 years was deemed unjustified, with the tribunal underscoring the need for substantial justice and control over delays. The appeal was ultimately dismissed due to the significant delay without compelling reasons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 09:41:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=603064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1445 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285995</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal as time-barred by 3389 days for the assessment year 2001-02, despite the assessee&#039;s request for condonation of delay citing inadvertent error and personnel changes. The tribunal found the lack of cogent reasoning and supporting evidence for the delay, emphasizing the importance of diligence and absence of negligence. Despite reliance on case law, the delay of about 10 years was deemed unjustified, with the tribunal underscoring the need for substantial justice and control over delays. The appeal was ultimately dismissed due to the significant delay without compelling reasons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>