<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 62 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21298</link>
    <description>Rejection of an application for approval under section 80-0 was quashed because the applicant had already supplied the information sought and the only remaining deficiency was the original agreement or a notarised copy. The High Court held that the applicant should have been given an opportunity to place the required document before the Board and answer the outstanding query. The matter was therefore remitted for reconsideration under section 80-0 after giving the applicant an opportunity to furnish the agreement or notarised copy and to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:08:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 62 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21298</link>
      <description>Rejection of an application for approval under section 80-0 was quashed because the applicant had already supplied the information sought and the only remaining deficiency was the original agreement or a notarised copy. The High Court held that the applicant should have been given an opportunity to place the required document before the Board and answer the outstanding query. The matter was therefore remitted for reconsideration under section 80-0 after giving the applicant an opportunity to furnish the agreement or notarised copy and to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>