<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 211 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391767</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal regarding the delay in filing the appeal before Ld CIT(A), condoning the delay and imposing a cost on the assessee. The ITAT also restored all issues to Ld CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. However, the appeal challenging the addition of Product Development Expenditure in the reassessment order was dismissed as the addition was made in the original assessment order passed u/s 143(3) and not in the reassessment order, rendering it non-appealable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 18:07:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 211 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391767</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal regarding the delay in filing the appeal before Ld CIT(A), condoning the delay and imposing a cost on the assessee. The ITAT also restored all issues to Ld CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. However, the appeal challenging the addition of Product Development Expenditure in the reassessment order was dismissed as the addition was made in the original assessment order passed u/s 143(3) and not in the reassessment order, rendering it non-appealable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>