<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 210 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the disallowance of interest income from scheduled banks but allowed deductions for interest income from cooperative banks under sections 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Proportionate disallowance was upheld in certain instances, and a statutory standard deduction under section 80P(2)(c) was allowed. The Tribunal partly allowed all three appeals for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 07:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 210 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the disallowance of interest income from scheduled banks but allowed deductions for interest income from cooperative banks under sections 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Proportionate disallowance was upheld in certain instances, and a statutory standard deduction under section 80P(2)(c) was allowed. The Tribunal partly allowed all three appeals for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>