https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285987 Section 482 CrPC permits quashing only in exceptional cases where allegations disclose no offence, a legal bar exists, or continuation would amount to abuse of process. The Court held that under Sections 3, 5 and 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, a general notification extending Special Police Establishment powers is sufficient and individual notification of each officer is not required. An inter-departmental letter could not be treated as a valid rescission of the earlier State consent or notification, and it did not satisfy Article 166 requirements. The FIR therefore could not be quashed for want of jurisdiction, and the proceedings were allowed to continue. en-us Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 10:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285987 Section 482 CrPC permits quashing only in exceptional cases where allegations disclose no offence, a legal bar exists, or continuation would amount to abuse of process. The Court held that under Sections 3, 5 and 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, a general notification extending Special Police Establishment powers is sufficient and individual notification of each officer is not required. An inter-departmental letter could not be treated as a valid rescission of the earlier State consent or notification, and it did not satisfy Article 166 requirements. The FIR therefore could not be quashed for want of jurisdiction, and the proceedings were allowed to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285987