https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391760 The High Court held that the impugned orders from 2007 were set aside due to the Tribunal's exercise of jurisdiction in reopening an appeal that had been disposed of in 1998 without notice of the previous order. The earlier order from 1998 was deemed to prevail, allowing the Respondent to pursue appropriate proceedings against it. The appeals were disposed of in favor of the Appellant, emphasizing the Tribunal's excess of jurisdiction in the 2007 order, with no costs awarded. en-us Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Nov 2020 17:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391760 The High Court held that the impugned orders from 2007 were set aside due to the Tribunal's exercise of jurisdiction in reopening an appeal that had been disposed of in 1998 without notice of the previous order. The earlier order from 1998 was deemed to prevail, allowing the Respondent to pursue appropriate proceedings against it. The appeals were disposed of in favor of the Appellant, emphasizing the Tribunal's excess of jurisdiction in the 2007 order, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391760