https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285986 At the quashing stage, the SC held that criminal proceedings may be interfered with only sparingly and not by assessing defence material or disputed facts as at trial. The High Court had erred in quashing the FIR and charge-sheet because the allegations, read at face value, disclosed a prima facie case of criminal conspiracy and fabrication of false evidence under the IPC. The prosecution was therefore treated as legitimate and allowed to proceed to trial, and the quashing order was set aside. en-us Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Feb 2020 17:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285986 At the quashing stage, the SC held that criminal proceedings may be interfered with only sparingly and not by assessing defence material or disputed facts as at trial. The High Court had erred in quashing the FIR and charge-sheet because the allegations, read at face value, disclosed a prima facie case of criminal conspiracy and fabrication of false evidence under the IPC. The prosecution was therefore treated as legitimate and allowed to proceed to trial, and the quashing order was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285986