https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391754 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI due to the appellant's non-prosecution and lack of engagement in addressing contradictions between decisions. The tribunal emphasized the importance of formally pronouncing decisions in open court, citing legal precedents to support the finality of the judgment. Despite multiple opportunities, the appellant's continuous absence and failure to participate led to the affirmation of the dismissal, highlighting the significance of active involvement in legal proceedings. en-us Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Feb 2020 17:48:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391754 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI due to the appellant's non-prosecution and lack of engagement in addressing contradictions between decisions. The tribunal emphasized the importance of formally pronouncing decisions in open court, citing legal precedents to support the finality of the judgment. Despite multiple opportunities, the appellant's continuous absence and failure to participate led to the affirmation of the dismissal, highlighting the significance of active involvement in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391754