https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391746 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI due to the Appellant's persistent failure to respond to hearing notices and attend scheduled hearings, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of actively participating in the legal process, citing relevant case law and the inherent authority of courts to dismiss cases for non-prosecution. The decision to dismiss the appeal under Rule 20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 was made after granting multiple adjournments, highlighting the importance of diligently pursuing appeals. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Feb 2020 08:26:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391746 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI due to the Appellant's persistent failure to respond to hearing notices and attend scheduled hearings, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of actively participating in the legal process, citing relevant case law and the inherent authority of courts to dismiss cases for non-prosecution. The decision to dismiss the appeal under Rule 20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 was made after granting multiple adjournments, highlighting the importance of diligently pursuing appeals. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391746