<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 189 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the right to claim interest on the entire amount deposited for the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It clarified that any pre-deposit made by the appellant falls within the scope of Section 35F, entitling them to interest under Section 35FF. The decision emphasizes adherence to statutory provisions governing pre-deposits and refund claims, ensuring appellants receive their entitled benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 08:19:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 189 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the right to claim interest on the entire amount deposited for the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It clarified that any pre-deposit made by the appellant falls within the scope of Section 35F, entitling them to interest under Section 35FF. The decision emphasizes adherence to statutory provisions governing pre-deposits and refund claims, ensuring appellants receive their entitled benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>