https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285975 In a summons-trial complaint under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Delhi HC said objections to the maintainability of the complaint and the summoning order should ordinarily be raised before the trial court at the stage of notice under Section 251 CrPC. The Court held that the trial court must examine the complaint and material, apply its mind, and pass a speaking order on such threshold objections, so inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC should not be used to bypass that process where an adequate remedy exists. Limited protection from personal appearance was granted until the trial court dealt with notice, subject to representation through counsel. en-us Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:34:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285975 In a summons-trial complaint under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Delhi HC said objections to the maintainability of the complaint and the summoning order should ordinarily be raised before the trial court at the stage of notice under Section 251 CrPC. The Court held that the trial court must examine the complaint and material, apply its mind, and pass a speaking order on such threshold objections, so inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC should not be used to bypass that process where an adequate remedy exists. Limited protection from personal appearance was granted until the trial court dealt with notice, subject to representation through counsel. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285975