<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (6) TMI 25 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21276</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the sold land, even if agricultural, within corporation limits attracts capital gains tax. The Tribunal&#039;s remand order was deemed futile as the land&#039;s character did not exempt it from tax. The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that capital gains on land within corporation limits are subject to income tax, regardless of agricultural status.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:04:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (6) TMI 25 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21276</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the sold land, even if agricultural, within corporation limits attracts capital gains tax. The Tribunal&#039;s remand order was deemed futile as the land&#039;s character did not exempt it from tax. The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that capital gains on land within corporation limits are subject to income tax, regardless of agricultural status.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>