<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 165 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391721</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the revenue authorities. The Court held that the appellant received the amount as long-term capital gains and not as income from other sources, disagreeing with the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The orders of all authorities below were interfered with based on this finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 165 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391721</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the revenue authorities. The Court held that the appellant received the amount as long-term capital gains and not as income from other sources, disagreeing with the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The orders of all authorities below were interfered with based on this finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>