https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285971 A later fee-fixation framework under the Andhra Pradesh Education Act did not automatically displace an earlier fee notification issued under the 1983 capitation-fee law, because the earlier statute had overriding effect and a fresh maximum fee had to be fixed under the later criteria to replace it. The prior writ proceedings also mattered: they had proceeded on the Advocate General's categorical statement that the earlier notification had ceased to operate, and that final position could not be reopened in collateral litigation. The stated principle is that the State cannot resile from a final position previously accepted in court and revive an earlier notification contrary to the statutory scheme. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Feb 2020 15:22:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285971 A later fee-fixation framework under the Andhra Pradesh Education Act did not automatically displace an earlier fee notification issued under the 1983 capitation-fee law, because the earlier statute had overriding effect and a fresh maximum fee had to be fixed under the later criteria to replace it. The prior writ proceedings also mattered: they had proceeded on the Advocate General's categorical statement that the earlier notification had ceased to operate, and that final position could not be reopened in collateral litigation. The stated principle is that the State cannot resile from a final position previously accepted in court and revive an earlier notification contrary to the statutory scheme. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285971