<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 150 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391706</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment. The Tribunal instructed the AO to re-evaluate the evidence provided by the assessee in accordance with principles established in a similar case. The decision highlighted the importance of conducting a thorough reassessment to determine the genuineness of the paintings and their source of acquisition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:48:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 150 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391706</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment. The Tribunal instructed the AO to re-evaluate the evidence provided by the assessee in accordance with principles established in a similar case. The decision highlighted the importance of conducting a thorough reassessment to determine the genuineness of the paintings and their source of acquisition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>