<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 148 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2008-2009, quashing the assessment under Section 144/153A due to the absence of incriminating material. For the assessment year 2013-2014, the Tribunal directed the AO to consider the disclosed advance tax payment of Rs. 33,33,333/- in computing income, granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Both appeals favored the assessee, with the first appeal allowed and the second allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:46:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 148 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2008-2009, quashing the assessment under Section 144/153A due to the absence of incriminating material. For the assessment year 2013-2014, the Tribunal directed the AO to consider the disclosed advance tax payment of Rs. 33,33,333/- in computing income, granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Both appeals favored the assessee, with the first appeal allowed and the second allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>