https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285957 The court dismissed the petition to quash the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing that the complaint contained all necessary allegations to establish the offence. The court clarified that the interpretation of Section 138 cannot solely rely on the bank's endorsement and that the essential conditions include the cheque being returned unpaid due to insufficient funds or exceeding the arrangement, with the drawer failing to pay within the specified period. Previous judgments were referenced but deemed unpersuasive, leading to the dismissal of the petition. en-us Fri, 05 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:04:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285957 The court dismissed the petition to quash the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing that the complaint contained all necessary allegations to establish the offence. The court clarified that the interpretation of Section 138 cannot solely rely on the bank's endorsement and that the essential conditions include the cheque being returned unpaid due to insufficient funds or exceeding the arrangement, with the drawer failing to pay within the specified period. Previous judgments were referenced but deemed unpersuasive, leading to the dismissal of the petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285957