https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285952 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that an arbitral tribunal has the jurisdiction to recall an order terminating proceedings under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, if sufficient cause is shown. The Court emphasized the importance of allowing the claimant to demonstrate sufficient cause before terminating proceedings, aligning with principles of natural justice and ensuring effective dispute resolution through arbitration. The appeal was dismissed, directing the arbitral tribunal to consider the claimant's application for recall and grant an extension for filing the statement of claim. en-us Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Feb 2020 19:47:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285952 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that an arbitral tribunal has the jurisdiction to recall an order terminating proceedings under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, if sufficient cause is shown. The Court emphasized the importance of allowing the claimant to demonstrate sufficient cause before terminating proceedings, aligning with principles of natural justice and ensuring effective dispute resolution through arbitration. The appeal was dismissed, directing the arbitral tribunal to consider the claimant's application for recall and grant an extension for filing the statement of claim. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285952