https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285949 The court held that the complaint against the Petitioner was not maintainable due to the legal notice for demand being issued beyond the 30-day period mandated by the Negotiable Instruments Act. Consequently, the order of summoning and related proceedings were quashed. The issue of vicarious liability regarding the company and territorial jurisdiction of the court were not extensively discussed in the judgment. en-us Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Feb 2020 17:44:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285949 The court held that the complaint against the Petitioner was not maintainable due to the legal notice for demand being issued beyond the 30-day period mandated by the Negotiable Instruments Act. Consequently, the order of summoning and related proceedings were quashed. The issue of vicarious liability regarding the company and territorial jurisdiction of the court were not extensively discussed in the judgment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285949