<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1914 (7) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285948</link>
    <description>On expiry of a yearly lease, acceptance of rent after the tenant holds over renews the tenancy by operation of law; where there is no agreement on holding over and the premises are not let for agricultural or manufacturing use, the renewed tenancy is month to month and terminable by fifteen days&#039; notice. A quit notice must be in writing and signed by the landlord or authorised agent, and a notice requiring the tenant to vacate on the month&#039;s last day satisfies the period requirement when the day of service is excluded. Service by registered post, however, does not by itself prove lawful tender or delivery, and an inadmissible endorsement on a returned cover is insufficient. Due service was not proved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 1914 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 17:00:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1914 (7) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285948</link>
      <description>On expiry of a yearly lease, acceptance of rent after the tenant holds over renews the tenancy by operation of law; where there is no agreement on holding over and the premises are not let for agricultural or manufacturing use, the renewed tenancy is month to month and terminable by fifteen days&#039; notice. A quit notice must be in writing and signed by the landlord or authorised agent, and a notice requiring the tenant to vacate on the month&#039;s last day satisfies the period requirement when the day of service is excluded. Service by registered post, however, does not by itself prove lawful tender or delivery, and an inadmissible endorsement on a returned cover is insufficient. Due service was not proved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 1914 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>