<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1948 (2) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285947</link>
    <description>The appeal and application for revision were dismissed as the appellant&#039;s claims were found to be barred by limitation. The courts determined that no material irregularity or fraud affected the execution sale, and the confirmation order was deemed valid. The respondent was awarded costs for the appeal, while no costs were ordered for the application for revision. Leave to appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 16:55:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1948 (2) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285947</link>
      <description>The appeal and application for revision were dismissed as the appellant&#039;s claims were found to be barred by limitation. The courts determined that no material irregularity or fraud affected the execution sale, and the confirmation order was deemed valid. The respondent was awarded costs for the appeal, while no costs were ordered for the application for revision. Leave to appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>